Get rid of the Mayonnaise!
We need to talk. These words often trigger anxiety, whether at home or at work. In fact, for many,...
The large number of employees also makes a code of conduct unavoidable. In many places, this also includes values that are desirable and are even used to assess employees and managers.
What happens time and again in everyday organisational life is that values are set in the hope that they will have an immediate generative effect. Values are therefore often highlighted in management workshops, propagated in training sessions or strived for by senior management. This is particularly noticeable when a change project is announced that is based on establishing new, better values: ‘We need to become more effective, more innovative, more entrepreneurial, more agile, build a culture of error, become a family, drive cultural change.’
General lack of understanding of the importance of values
When values are defined in this way in advance and often from the top down, it demonstrates a general lack of understanding of how values arise and work. Values are complex in nature and are therefore not compatible with mechanistic approaches. Everyone knows, for example, that trust cannot be prescribed, but is created through long-term processes with suitable framework conditions.
Values that are developed in workshops, for example, are not wrong per se, but all too often the desired or learned values that are found on websites and in codes of conduct are asked for. Dave Snowden, an expert in complexity thinking and knowledge management, puts it this way: ‘Once you've written down your values, you've lost them.’ In other words, you show your employees what you want to hear without actually changing anything. If these values are then not exemplified by the management, they mutate from guiding principles to rigid guidelines that encourage lip service rather than genuine, value-based action.
How are values created? - Value specifications versus value streams
Furthermore, such values are far too coarse-grained to serve as real guidelines for day-to-day behaviour. There is a danger here of confusing organisational value specifications with the actual, lived and finely woven ‘value streams’. Real organisational life is far richer and more turbulent than what is described in official documents.
It is therefore worth looking at values from a different perspective that does not rely on mechanistic metaphors. In this context, values are the results of complex interactions, relationships and experiences within a human system. They emerge from the interplay of multiple factors, including individual beliefs, social dynamics and organisational cultures.
They emerge from the sum total of all daily interactions, decisions and experiences of everyone in the organisation. They evolve as the organisation itself evolves. They are therefore an expression of the collective intelligence and adaptive learning of an organisation and show what is really important to the company. In short, values are like an organisation's dynamic navigation system, constantly updating itself to keep it on the best path.
Building a culture of values
Working with values at this level in the organisation requires a nuanced approach. In organisational development, cultural change and value discussions, the key is to work with what exists rather than what should happen. It's about recognising which values are actually lived and shape the culture:
Anne Caspari (MSc) is a specialist for change and transformative proceses, in the context of personal development as well as leadership training and culture change.
Prior to becoming a coach in 2002, she worked as an expert for strategic environmental planning. This work allows her to draw on over 3 decades of experience with complex systems, adaptive pushback and the integration of obstacles to self-organisation. Combining this knowledge with over 16 years of transformative coaching and 12 years of leadership training and development gives her a comprehensive approach for her coaching practice.[nbsp]
In her work she integrates the best of Integral Theory, adult development, complexity thinking, Theory U and Robert Kegan’s work on „Immunity to Change“.[nbsp] In 1:1 coaching, she helps clients to identify and integrate unconscious patterns and resistances to growth (developmental coaching). She works with leaders to support them in their journey towards effective leadership and greater impact (executive coaching). Her focus is the leader ‘s growth edge in cultivating critical capacities needed to successfully navigate the complexity and uncertainty of today’s business environment.[nbsp] She also works with teams and helps them identify obstacles to internal alignment and coherence, and to release team intelligence. She facilitates change processes and acts as a partner to her clients in fostering emergent (micro)processes in the direction of bigger themes, such as purpose, values, mindset and culture shifts (change and organisational development). She is fluent in English, German and Italian.[nbsp]
[nbsp]
We need to talk. These words often trigger anxiety, whether at home or at work. In fact, for many,...
In today's polarized world, conflict is inevitable. This is especially true in the workplace,...
Leave a Comment